Georgia Militia Handbook (link available to Members only)
Patrol Pack - list of useful items for your Combat Rig
*Drop Pack - list of items for your Survival Rig
Supply List - list of useful items for your Bug-Out Bag
L.B.E. - list of Load Bearing Equipment
*Technical & Feild Manual: Medical

The Authority for Lawmaking is limited to CONGRESS!

Our Founding Fathers went through great lengths to assure that it would be difficult for Government to impose new laws - they created a system in which Liberty would be the norm and restraint would be the exception. However, lawmaking by the executive branch, and even by the judicial branch, inverts this whole process; a single bureaucrat, with the wave of his/her pen, creates new laws specifically designated by the Constitution only to the legislative branch. Suddenly, victims of the new restriction must carry the burden of trying to get the legislators to pass a new law to remove the infringement on Liberty. Legislators who allow the executive (or judicial) exercise the legislative power to make laws are demolishing our constitutional system of lawmaking - essentially they commit unconstitutional acts and are subverting our democratic republic. Furthermore, the Judicial has abandoned its Constitutional duty of enforcing the seperation of powers between the legislative and executive branches. This is evident by the sheer volume of unconstitutional laws made by the executive branch (the illegitimate Code of Federal Regulations) which is roughly four times larger than the volume of laws Constitutionally created by Congress (the united States Code). It's time Citizens stop acting like Subjects and begin to insist that the subversion of Article I of the Constitution, by the ursurpation of the lawmaking function, cease and desist immediately!

CONGRESS is limited in its power to TAX!

The taxing clauses of the Constitution gave Congress two taxing powers: 1) the power to impose uniform indirect taxes (such as the uniform excise tax on gasoline and the uniform tariff on steel; and 2) apportioned direct taxes (such as a head tax). In 1913 the 16th Amendment was purportedly ratified. It reads, "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration"
Notice, the 16th Amendment does NOT say, "Congress shall have the power to lay and collect DIRECT taxes without apportionment". Any reasonable person would agree that the power to impose a DIRECT, UN-APPORTIONED tax would be a new power, not granted by the original taxing clauses of the Constitution, that would forever fundamentally alter and remove one of the most powerful limitations on our government. Eventually, the Supreme Court got around to defining the word income within the meaning of the 16th Amendment -- but not before 1916. In 1913, just months after the ratification of the 16th Amendment (the questionably ratified Income Tax Amendment), the political branches adopted the Income Tax Act of 1913, within which the political branches deliberately stretched the constrained authority of the 16th Amendment, by laying and collecting an UN-APPORTIONED tax directly on People's labor as measured by their salaries, wages and compensation, AND by instituting withholding at the source.
However, in 1916, the Supreme Court brought the action of Congress and the Executive branch to a screeching halt. The Supreme Court ruled in Brushaber (and the cases bundled with it), that the 16th Amendment gave Congress no new taxing power (a direct tax on labor without apportionment would be a new taxing power, not granted by the taxing clauses of the original Constitution), and that income within the constitutional limitations of the 16th Amendment is corporate gain or profit, and passive and unearned income from real estate and investments. NOTE: The ability to tax passive income from investments and real estate (by nature an indirect, excise tax) was the only rationale given by those behind the ratification of the 16th Amendment, prior to its ratification. The publicly stated aim by those proposing the 16th Amendment was the power to tax accumulated wealth.
In 1916, immediately following the Brushaber decision, Congress amended the Income Tax Act, to bring the law into compliance with Brushaber: first, by removing the tax imposed by the Income Tax Act of 1913 (the direct, un-apportioned tax on labor as measured by salaries, wages and compensation); second, to outlaw the withholding of wages from the paychecks of citizens; and third, to direct the Executive Department to refund all monies previously withheld.
However, the political branches and the central bank were not going to give up the labor tax too easily. In Section 25 of the Federal Income Tax Act of 1916 (amended in 1917), Congress merely declared that the "income" subject to the 1913 Act was not the same income to be taxed under the 1916 Act. However, Congress did not go any further in defining what, specifically was taxable and what was NOT taxable. Why not? We believe the reason is that the political branches wanted to perpetuate the labor tax, which is what they have now been getting away with for 87 years.
SEE http://www.861.htm for much, much more information!